{"id":6383,"date":"2011-05-04t09:13:17","date_gmt":"2011-05-04t15:13:17","guid":{"rendered":"\/\/www.imrbdigital.com\/?p=6383"},"modified":"2011-04-28t09:14:50","modified_gmt":"2011-04-28t15:14:50","slug":"teaching-outside-the-classroom-part-two","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.imrbdigital.com\/2011\/05\/teaching-outside-the-classroom-part-two\/","title":{"rendered":"teaching outside the classroom – part two"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

by john morrell<\/strong>
\ngraduate teaching fellow, cft<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/strong>on april 5, 2011, the 2022年世界杯中国小组赛积分 hosted a \u201cconversation on teaching\u201d on the topic of \u201cteaching outside the classroom.\u201d this is the second installment of a two-part blog post covering the observations made by two panelists \u2013 steve baskauf from biology and david furbish from earth and environmental sciences \u2013 as they reflected on their experiences teaching courses that involve a field component.<\/em><\/p>\n

professor of earth and environmental sciences david furbish<\/strong> discussed an upper-level course he teaches in geomorphology.\u00a0 professor furbish argued for the inherent interest that geology seems to provoke \u2013 this is a course about how the landscape that we see evolves, and therefore a naturally compelling topic.\u00a0 furbish\u2019s courses are smaller than baskauf\u2019s, with 12 students and one ta.\u00a0 as an upper-level course, the students all have some background in ees.<\/p>\n

furbish focused on the task of balancing formality and informality and guiding students towards target topics.\u00a0 he reflected on the important steps of designing a meaningful field experience:<\/p>\n