<\/a>by derek bruff, assistant director<\/em><\/p>\n
over on the profhacker blog today, vanderbilt phd alumna heather whitney<\/a> shares her recent experience <\/a>discovering that students were saying things on her end-of-course feedback survey that were verifiably incorrect. several students complained that they felt it unfair that they weren’t told how their final projects were going to be graded. however, heather had shared with her students her grading rubric for those projects a month in advance, posting it to the course management system and announcing its availability in class.<\/p>\n
also, i see a connection here to our ongoing series exploring student expectations for teaching and learning. in fact, our next conversation in this series<\/a>, tuesday afternoon here at the cft at 4:10 pm, will focus on student and faculty expectations for student and faculty responsibilities in a course. some of heather’s students didn’t know how they were going to be evaluated. whose responsibility is that?<\/p>\n
update: <\/strong>alan jacobs has posted a thoughtful reply<\/a> to heather’s piece on his blog at the new atlantis.<\/p>\n
image: “wrong way!<\/a>“, richard elzey, flickr (cc)<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"