‘testing effect’
three things i learned while writing about test-enhanced learning
aug. 24, 2015—by rachel biel, cft undergraduate intern i recently had the privilege of coauthoring an essay about the benefits of testing beyond assessment. as a student who is tested most commonly for formal assessment, the idea of testing as part of the learning process was new to me. beyond the practical implications of incorporating more testing...
learning about the basics of learning
aug. 17, 2015—by cynthia brame, ph.d., cft assistant director last september, i read an article in the new york times magazine suggesting that pre-testing could improve subsequent student learning. the article was based on work by elizabeth ligon bjork and colleagues, and indicated that pre-testing could help students avoid the “fluency fallacy” and might alert them to...
test-enhanced learning: using retrieval practice to help students learn
aug. 17, 2015—by cynthia j. brame and rachel biel print version cite this guide: brame, c. j. and biel, r. (2015). test-enhanced learning: the potential for testing to promote greater learning in undergraduate science courses. cbe—life sciences education 14, 1-12.the information in this guide has been published in cbe—life sciences education (www.lifescied.org/content/14/2/es4.full.pdf+html).” what is “test-enhanced learning”? six...